Frantz v. Schriro

Ninth Circuit

Frantz v. Schriro

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 2006

Docket05-16024

StatusPublished

This text of Frantz v. Schriro (Frantz v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frantz v. Schriro, (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARL ADOLPH FRANTZ,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 05-16024 v.  D.C. No. CV-04-00135-WDB HERBERT HAZEY; DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, ORDER Respondents-Appellees.  Filed December 29, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

107 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARL ADOLPH FRANTZ,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 05-16024 v.  D.C. No. CV-04-00135-WDB HERBERT HAZEY; DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, ORDER Respondents-Appellees.  Filed December 29, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

107 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Frantz v. Schriro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frantz-v-schriro-ca9-2006.