Frantz v. Canter
177 F. App'x 690
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) [691]*691(summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frantz v. Canter, 177 F. App'x 690 (9th Cir. 2006).
177 F. App'x 690 (Frantz v. Canter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)