Frankum v. Farlinger
This text of 132 S.E. 923 (Frankum v. Farlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The owner of premises abutting on a public -road is under no duty to keep the premises at a point some distance from the road in a safe condition for pedestrians who, not in the ordinary course of travel, wander off the road and come uninvited on the premises. Thus, a person traveling along the road upon a dark night in an automobile, who leaves the automobile and goes uninvited upon the premises, [306]*306and, at a jioint eight or ten feet from the road, falls into an unguarded well and is injured, can not recover from the owner of the premises for such injuries. Savannah, Florida & Western R. Co. v. Beavers, 113 Ga. 398 (39 S. E. 82, 54 L. R. A. 314); Etheredge v. Central of Ga. R. Co., 122 Ga. 853 (50 S. E. 1003).
2. The petition set forth no cause of action, and was properly dismissed upon demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 S.E. 923, 35 Ga. App. 305, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankum-v-farlinger-gactapp-1926.