Franks v. Stivers

1 Add. 46
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County·Decided December 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

President.

As it is admitted, that there ought to be a verdict against the defendant for the surplus; as the want of this is the only real damage, which the plaintiff has suffered ; and as the sale was occasioned by his own gross delinquency ; this does not seem to be a case proper for damages beyond mere compensation ; and it is therefore unecessary for us, to say any thing as to the right of carriers, in such cases; and perhaps, it will conduce most to justice, if they and owners, have a respect for the rights of each other.

Verdict for plaintiff accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franks v. Stivers, 1 Add. 46 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1792).

1 Add. 46 (Franks v. Stivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julie Beberman v. Antony Blinken
61 F.4th 978 (D.C. Circuit, 2023)