Franks v. Stivers
This text of 1 Add. 46 (Franks v. Stivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As it is admitted, that there ought to be a verdict against the defendant for the surplus; as the want of this is the only real damage, which the plaintiff has suffered ; and as the sale was occasioned by his own gross delinquency ; this does not seem to be a case proper for damages beyond mere compensation ; and it is therefore unecessary for us, to say any thing as to the right of carriers, in such cases; and perhaps, it will conduce most to justice, if they and owners, have a respect for the rights of each other.
Verdict for plaintiff accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Add. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franks-v-stivers-pactcomplallegh-1792.