Franks v. State

11 S.W.3d 561, 340 Ark. 640, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 119

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Franks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 Ark. 167 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 9, 2000·No. CR 00-205·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Warden Franks, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Eric T. Bishop, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion wfil be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Warden Franks, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Eric T. Bishop, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion wfil be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Franks v. State, 11 S.W.3d 561, 340 Ark. 640, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 119 (Ark. 2000).

Pincite

11 S.W.3d 561 (Franks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.