Franks v. Franks

469 So. 2d 934, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14296
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1985·No. No. 84-2292·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order awarding the appellant's interest in the property owned by himself and his ex-wife, the appellee, as tenants in common is vacated. By final order rendered on July 20, 1982, the trial court ordered the partition of the property in question through its sale and the subsequent division of the proceeds between the parties. This partition order was affirmed by this court, Franks v. Franks, 430 So.2d 463 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 433 So.2d 519 (Fla.1983), and our mandate was issued on May 27, 1983. Accordingly, the trial court was without jurisdiction to amend or modify the order, affirmed by this court, and grant some new, different or further relief. See Wood v. Manatee Bay Corp., 386 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Therefore, the order rendered on July 12, 1984 purporting tc award the appellant’s interest in the property to the appellee as lump sum alimony is a nullity and is hereby vacated and set aside.1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franks v. Franks, 469 So. 2d 934, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14296 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

469 So. 2d 934 (Franks v. Franks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. Horton
179 So. 3d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Semko v. Semko
537 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)