Franks, R., Pets. v. State Farm Mutual
This text of Franks, R., Pets. v. State Farm Mutual (Franks, R., Pets. v. State Farm Mutual) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ROBERT FRANKS AND KELLY A. : No. 563 MAL 2021 FRANKS, H/W, : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE : INSURANCE COMPANY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Did the en banc panel of the Superior Court err in ruling that Respondent was not required to obtain a new uninsured/underinsured stacking waiver from Petitioners pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1738(c) of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law when Petitioners deleted an automobile from their automobile insurance policy, and necessarily holding therefore that Petitioners are not entitled to a total of $200,000 in stacked underinsured motorist coverage?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Franks, R., Pets. v. State Farm Mutual, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franks-r-pets-v-state-farm-mutual-pa-2022.