Franklin Washington Trust Co. v. McCloskey

283 A.D. 778, 129 N.Y.S.2d 499
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously reversed. The affidavits submitted on behalf of the defendant are quite inadequate to support the defenses set up in the answer, in accordance with the strict requirements of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, but in the interest of justice since the court, based on the inadequately supported eonelusory statements, is of the [779] opinion that these defendants in the particular and unusual circumstances herein appearing may have a defense, the order is reversed and the motion remitted to Special Term for the submission of further affidavits by the defendants, if they are so advised, factually supporting their pleaded defenses, and for a rehearing. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin Washington Trust Co. v. McCloskey, 283 A.D. 778, 129 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

283 A.D. 778 (Franklin Washington Trust Co. v. McCloskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenberg v. Ughetto
17 Misc. 2d 46 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)