Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc

Nevada Supreme Court

Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc

DecidedFebruary 28, 2020

Docket74332

StatusPublished

This text of Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc (Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc, (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JACQUELINE FRANKLIN; ASHLEIGH No. 74332 PARK; LILY SHEPARD; STACIE ALLEN; MICHAELA DEVINE; KARINA STRELKOVA; AND DANIELLE LAMAR, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON FILED BEHALF OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS, Appellants, vs. RUSSELL ROAD FOOD AND BEVERAGE, LLC, (D/B/A CRAZY DOE CLUB OWNER, I-X), Res • ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND REMANDING TO THE DISTRICT COURT

Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and atorney fees. NRAP 42(b). This matter is remanded to the district court to conduct appropriate proceedings, if any, to alter, amend, or vacate its order or judgment as necessary for the parties to fulfill the terms of their settlement agreement. In the event the district court declines to grant the requested relief, appellant may file a motion to reinstate this appeal. Any such motion to reinstate the appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the district court's order denying relief. The oral argument of this matter currently scheduled for March 2, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. is vacated. It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 434D 70- 0 t Q(92. cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Bighorn LawfLas Vegas Rusing Lopez & Lizardi, PLLC Kamer Zucker Abbott Bendavid Law Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 ( 0) I447A ..1P).•

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JACQUELINE FRANKLIN; ASHLEIGH No. 74332 PARK; LILY SHEPARD; STACIE ALLEN; MICHAELA DEVINE; KARINA STRELKOVA; AND DANIELLE LAMAR, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON FILED BEHALF OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS, Appellants, vs. RUSSELL ROAD FOOD AND BEVERAGE, LLC, (D/B/A CRAZY DOE CLUB OWNER, I-X), Res • ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND REMANDING TO THE DISTRICT COURT

Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and atorney fees. NRAP 42(b). This matter is remanded to the district court to conduct appropriate proceedings, if any, to alter, amend, or vacate its order or judgment as necessary for the parties to fulfill the terms of their settlement agreement. In the event the district court declines to grant the requested relief, appellant may file a motion to reinstate this appeal. Any such motion to reinstate the appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the district court's order denying relief. The oral argument of this matter currently scheduled for March 2, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. is vacated. It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 434D 70- 0 t Q(92. cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Bighorn LawfLas Vegas Rusing Lopez & Lizardi, PLLC Kamer Zucker Abbott Bendavid Law Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 ( 0) I447A ..1P).•

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Franklin Vs. Russell Rd. Food And Beverage, Llc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-vs-russell-rd-food-and-beverage-llc-nev-2020.