Franklin v. Tarrant County Appraisal District
This text of 585 F. App'x 3 (Franklin v. Tarrant County Appraisal District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tom Franklin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. Because Franklin may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-tarrant-county-appraisal-district-ca4-2014.