Franklin v. State

1949 OK CR 62, 206 P.2d 1011, 89 Okla. Crim. 267, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 200
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 25, 1949
DocketNo. A-11027.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1949 OK CR 62 (Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. State, 1949 OK CR 62, 206 P.2d 1011, 89 Okla. Crim. 267, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 200 (Okla. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

The defendant, Jack Franklin, was charged by information filed in the court of common pleas *268 of Oklahoma county, with the unlawful possession of 93 pints of whisky; a jury was waived, the defendant was tried, found guilty, and sentenced to. serve 30 days in the county jail, and pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.

There was no appearance on behalf of the defendant at the time the case was assigned for oral argument and no briefs have been filed.

We have examined the record; the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction. The defendant presented' a motion to suppress the evidence, but failed to sustain the burden of showing that the search by the officers was invalid.

The judgment and sentence of the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county is affirmed.

BAREFOOT and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMillon v. State
1952 OK CR 94 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1949 OK CR 62, 206 P.2d 1011, 89 Okla. Crim. 267, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1949.