Franklin v. State
179 S.E. 649, 51 Ga. App. 98, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 577
Opinion
While it is necessary in the prosecution of one for operating an automobile when under the influence of some intoxicant to prove that he dids operate the automobile (Austin v. State, 47 Ga. App. 191, 170 S. E. 86), yet this may be proved either by direct or circumstantial evidence; and there were sufficient circumstances, together with admissions of the defendant, for the jury to conclude that he did operate the automobile as charged.
Judgment affirmed:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin v. State, 179 S.E. 649, 51 Ga. App. 98, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
179 S.E. 649 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stephens v. State
193 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)