Franklin v. State
77 S.E. 653, 12 Ga. App. 483, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 600
Opinion
This being a prosecution upon the charge of carrying a pistol without a license, and it not appearing, from the evidence, that the accused had a pistol at any place other than his home or place of business (the testimony showing that at the time he was alleged to have had the pistol in his possession he was on a farm where he lived and worked, and which he owned in common with others), his conviction was unauthorized, and a new trial should have been granted. See Coker v. State, ante, 425; Miller v. State, ante, 479.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin v. State, 77 S.E. 653, 12 Ga. App. 483, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 600 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
77 S.E. 653 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mayo v. State
207 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Reagan v. State
85 S.E. 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)