Franklin v. State

581 So. 2d 652, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6880, 1991 WL 119671
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Franklin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 541 So. 2d 1227
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1991·No. No. 90-1036·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Franklin appeals from a judgment of conviction and habitual offender sentence imposed for four counts of sale of cocaine and a single count of being a principal to the sale of cocaine. Although we affirm the judgment of conviction, we must reverse the habitual offender sentence that [653]*653was imposed pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). The record reveals that appellant’s predicate convictions were rendered on the same date. In light of our holding in Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (en banc), that habitual offender classification cannot be based upon convictions rendered on the same date, we reverse the habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing.

ERVIN, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. State, 581 So. 2d 652, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6880, 1991 WL 119671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

581 So. 2d 652 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. State
576 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)