Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Franklin v. State

Franklin v. State

498 So. 2d 1035, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1986
DocketNo. BK-300
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 498 So. 2d 1035 (Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. State, 498 So. 2d 1035, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding this court’s prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.-111(6), Fla.Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.-111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. State
515 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Goff v. State
498 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 1035, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.