Franklin v. State
498 So. 2d 1035, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1986·No. No. BK-300·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Notwithstanding this court’s prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.-111(6), Fla.Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.-111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin v. State, 498 So. 2d 1035, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
498 So. 2d 1035 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. State
515 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Goff v. State
498 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)