Franklin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Franklin v. State

998 S.W.2d 738, 338 Ark. 507, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 416

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 9, 1999·No. CR 99-962·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Kevin Franklin, by his attorney, Louis Etoch, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Kevin Franklin, by his attorney, Louis Etoch, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, supra.

Franklin v. State, 998 S.W.2d 738, 338 Ark. 507, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 416 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

998 S.W.2d 738 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related