Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Franklin v. State

Franklin v. State

998 S.W.2d 738, 338 Ark. 507, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 9, 1999
DocketCR 99-962
StatusPublished

This text of 998 S.W.2d 738 (Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. State, 998 S.W.2d 738, 338 Ark. 507, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 416 (Ark. 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Kevin Franklin, by his attorney, Louis Etoch, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
998 S.W.2d 738, 338 Ark. 507, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-state-ark-1999.