Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.

50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 605, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 278

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 25, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 342 (Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin v. Pritchard Bros., 50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 605, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 278 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Lamar, J.

1. Where there is nothing to show that a letter has been lost, it-is not error to refuse to admit secondary evidence as to its contents.

2, There being no complaint made of the charge of the court, and the testimony, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the finding, this court will not interfere with his refusal to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI