Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.
50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 605, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 278
Opinion
1. Where there is nothing to show that a letter has been lost, it-is not error to refuse to admit secondary evidence as to its contents.
2, There being no complaint made of the charge of the court, and the testimony, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the finding, this court will not interfere with his refusal to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin v. Pritchard Bros., 50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 605, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 278 (Ga. 1905).
50 S.E. 342 (Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A., B. & C. Railroad Benefit Ass'n v. South
175 S.E. 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)