Franklin v. Piper

23 S.W. 942, 5 Tex. Civ. App. 253, 1893 Tex. App. LEXIS 583
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 15, 1893
DocketNo. 83.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 S.W. 942 (Franklin v. Piper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. Piper, 23 S.W. 942, 5 Tex. Civ. App. 253, 1893 Tex. App. LEXIS 583 (Tex. Ct. App. 1893).

Opinion

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This is a suit in the ordinary form of trespass to try title, brought by the appellants on the 12th day of July, 1890, in the District Court of Edwards County, to recover from the appellee John M. Piper three tracts of land situated in said county, which are described as follows, viz.: One-third of a league of land, patented to the heirs of Elijah B. Franklin on the 3rd day of July, 1847, patent number 458, volume 5; 640 acres of land, patented to the heirs of Elijah B. Franklin on the 3rd day of July, 1847, patent number 56, volume 2, certificate number 1032; and 1280 acres of land, patented to the heirs of Elijah B. Franklin on the 8th day of December, A. D. 1847, certificate number 9486, patent number 247, volume 4.

J. E. Gillespie, M. L. Burton, W. F. Gillespie, David W. Gillespie, and Mary A. Taylor, joined by her husband, Joel M. Taylor, entered an ap *255 pearance as defendants, and plead not guilty, and the statutes of limitations of three, five, and ten years. The original defendant, John M. Piper, entered a disclaimer of any interest in the lands, and averred that he was in possession of-the same as the tenant of his codefendants.

The venue of the case was, by agreement, changed to the District Court of Uvalde County, where the case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for the defendants, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The assignments of error relate to the construction of a certain power of attorney, set out in our conclusions of fact, to the admission of certain letters in evidence, also shown in said conclusions, and to the conclusions of fact and law found by the court below; all of which assignments are passed upon by this court in its conclusions of law.

Conclusions of Fact. — 1. The three tracts of land sued for were patented to the heirs of Elijah B. Franklin on the dates mentioned in the statement of the case.

2. Elijah B. Franklin was an unmarried man, a soldier in the Texas Revolution, and was killed in the battle of San Jacinto. His father, William Franklin, and his mother, Edith, died before he was killed.

3. Elijah B. Franklin left surviving him Peter F. Franklin and- Mary E. Bailey and William F. Franklin, brothers and sister of the whole blood, and Thomas J. Franklin and Bryant P. Franklin, brothers of the half blood of Elijah B. Franklin. He had another brother of the half blood, Burrell W. Franklin, who died in Alabama in 1835.

4. Peter F. Franklin and William F. Franklin, surviving brothers of Elijah B., are plaintiffs in this suit. The plaintiffs John T. Franklin, Nancy E. Williams, Charles C. Campbell, and Martha J. Brown are the heirs at law of Burrell W. Franklin, deceased; and the plaintiffs Amanda F. Williams, Rebecca H. Mullen, Mary E. Lafon, Ann E. Ashworth, Amanda P. Ashworth, Adeline R. Bentley, Cornelia A. Bailey, R. S. Bailey, Edward G. Bailey, Adolphus Bailey, and A. W. Bailey are the heirs at law of Mary E. Bailey, who died in 1847. William G. Bailey, who was the husband of Mary E. Bailey, died in 1847; and Bryant P. Franklin died in 1864, and left no children surviving him.

5. The land certificate by virtue of which the one-third of a league of land in controversy was located was not issued by the Board of Land Commissioners of Fayette County until the 3rd day of February, 1845, and the 1280 acres of land in controversy was surveyed on the-day of May, 1847, by virtue of land certificate number 9486.

6. On the 22nd day of October, 1838, Bryant P. Franklin, William Franklin, Peter F. Franklin, and William G. Bailey executed a power of attorney to Thomas J. Franklin, appointing him their attorney in fact, *256 in which the power granted is in the following language, viz.: “ For us and in our names and for our use, for the recovery of a certain tract or parcel of land lying in the State of Texas, which our late brother Elijah B. Franklin is entitled to receive from the Texas Government for services rendered said Government as a soldier in the army thereof, and who was killed in battle bravely fighting the enemies of the Republic. The number of acres to which our deceased brother is entitled is about 4000, as we are informed. We do hereby, for ourselves, our heirs, authorize our attorney, the said Thomas J. Franklin, to take all lawful ways and means for the recovery of said lands; to institute suit, grant receipts and acquittances in our names, but for our use; to appoint one or more attorneys, should he deem it necessary; and in the event of his receiving a grant or patent for said land, to make sale thereof for the best price he can, and to make the necessary conveyance in our names to the purchaser or purchasers thereof, and grant all receipts, acquittances, and discharges which may be necessary and lawful in the premises, and which we or either of us could lawfully make, execute, seal, and deliver were we personally present.”

7. On the 8th day of April, 1839, the following instrument was executed, to-wit:

‘ ‘ The State of Alabama, Morgan County. — Know all men by these presents, that we, Bryant P. Franklin, of the county of Nota way and State of Virginia (by'his attorney in fact for that purpose created, Thomas J. Franklin), Peter F. Franklin, and William G. Bailey and Eliza, his wife, of the county of Lulenburg, by their attorney in fact, Thomas J. Franklin, for this purpose created, and Thomas J. Franklin, of the State and county first above written, for divers good and sufficient reasons thereunto specially moving, have and by these presents do appoint and constitute Robert A. Gillespie, citizen of the Republic of Texas, our true and lawful attorney in fact, for us and in our name to apply to the Government of said Republic, and otherwise as to him may seem fit, for the recovery of certain land lying and being in said Republic, which is due on account of the military services of our late brother, Elijah B. Franklin, rendered to the said Republic, in whose cause he was killed bravely fighting her enemies.
“The number of acres of land to which our late brother was entitled is supposed to be about 4000, and we fully empower our said attorney in fact to grant and execute all receipts or acquittances which may be required; and in case of recovering the land, to make sale of the same, and for us and in our names to execute full and complete titles to the same, and to do and to make everything which may be required either for the recovery or the disposing of said land; to accept or make any arrangement he may think proper; fully authorize him to sign our names or affix *257 our seals to any manner of instrument necessary in the premises, and deliver the same as though we were personally present; hereby ratifying and confirming all things and acts done or to be done by our said attorney in fact in the premises, in as full and ample manner as if we were personally present.
“ In testimony whereof we hereunto sign our names and affix our seal, this the 8th day of April, in the year of our Lord 1839.”

Which the parties named signed by their attorney in fact, Thomas Franklin.

8. R, A. Gillespie obtained letters of administration on the estate of E. B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tirado v. Tirado
357 S.W.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Glover v. McFaddin
205 F.2d 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Bank of Carrollton, Miss. v. Latting
1913 OK 85 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.W. 942, 5 Tex. Civ. App. 253, 1893 Tex. App. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-piper-texapp-1893.