Franklin v. Mid-America Hotels Corp.

413 S.W.3d 21, 2013 WL 5744636, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1243
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 99710·Published

Opinion

[22] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Franklin (“Employee”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Employee contends the Commission’s finding she did not sustain a work-related accident was not supported by competent and substantial evidence and was contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

The Commission’s findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence and were not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. Mid-America Hotels Corp., 413 S.W.3d 21, 2013 WL 5744636, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1243 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

413 S.W.3d 21 (Franklin v. Mid-America Hotels Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.