Franklin v. Johns

436 F. App'x 210
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2011·No. No. 11-6128·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Franklin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Franklin v. Johns, No. 5:09-cb-03023-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. Johns, 436 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2011).

436 F. App'x 210 (Franklin v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanson v. Goodman
N.D. West Virginia, 2025
Ulysse v. Stokes
District of Columbia, 2021
Gaddis v. Harrison
W.D. Kentucky, 2020
Tolley v. Caldwell
W.D. Virginia, 2020
Hammitt v. Stump
S.D. West Virginia, 2019
Brandon Pegg v. Grant Herrnberger
845 F.3d 112 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Spencer v. District of Columbia
168 F. Supp. 3d 114 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Weigle v. Pifer ex rel. City of Vienna Police Department
139 F. Supp. 3d 760 (S.D. West Virginia, 2015)
Rex v. West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine
119 F. Supp. 3d 542 (S.D. West Virginia, 2015)
Swagler v. Sheridan
837 F. Supp. 2d 509 (D. Maryland, 2011)