Franklin v. Dutton

21 P. 964, 79 Cal. 605, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 782
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 4, 1889
DocketNo. 12946
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 21 P. 964 (Franklin v. Dutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. Dutton, 21 P. 964, 79 Cal. 605, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 782 (Cal. 1889).

Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

—This action was commenced in the superior court of the county of Santa Barbara for the [606]*606reformation of a contract for the sale by plaintiffs to defendant of a certain tract of land lying in .said county. Defendant demurred to the complaint, and at the same time demanded a change of the place of trial to San Francisco, the place of his residence. The court made an order changing the place of trial as demanded. From that order plaintiffs appealed, and contend here that under section 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure they are entitled to have the action tried in the county of Santa Barbara, where it was commenced. If it be an action for the determination, in any form, .of a right or interest in real estate situated in Santa Barbara County, it must be tried in that county.

This action, as we construe it, is for the determination of a right or interest in real estate.

Order reversed.

Works, J., Paterson, J., Thornton, J., and Beatty, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massae v. Superior Court
118 Cal. App. 3d 527 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Marcacci v. Continental Baking Co.
202 Cal. App. 2d 224 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Kaluzok v. Brisson
167 P.2d 481 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
Banbury v. Brailsford
158 P.2d 826 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1945)
Browne v. Gajan
175 So. 486 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Heinecke v. Scott
26 P.2d 167 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)
McKinney v. Mires
26 P.2d 169 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)
Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank
24 P.2d 960 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Stanley v. Barney
10 P.2d 1022 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Terry v. Rivergarden Farms Co.
154 P. 476 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 964, 79 Cal. 605, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-dutton-cal-1889.