Franklin v. City of Norwich

258 A.D. 757, 14 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6785

Opinion

Defendant, City of Norwich, has appealed from an order of the Chenango Special Term of the Supreme Court denying its motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The city’s contention is that the complaint fails to allege a proper presentation of the claim, out of which the action arose, to the common council of the city as required by the provisions of the City Charter. While the complaint is not a model pleading the allegations thereof and the statements in the bill of particulars contain all the essential elements of a good cause of action in compliance with the provisions of the defendant’s charter. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. City of Norwich, 258 A.D. 757, 14 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 757 (Franklin v. City of Norwich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.