Franklin v. City of Brunswick
This text of 141 S.E. 66 (Franklin v. City of Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. By an ordinance of tlio City of Brunswick, each plumber or gas-fitter is required to give bond conditioned to indemnify tire city and property-owners against his negligence in performing his work, as a condition precedent to obtaining a license, without which a license will not be granted to such plumber or gas-fitter. Under the above ordinance a plumber or gas-fitter, in order to procure a license to carry on his business in the City of Brunswick, could give bond with personal sureties, and is not required to give a bond with an indemnity company as surety. Maloy v. Williams, 140 Ga. 376, 379 (78 S. B. 1054).
2. In the absence of ordinance, charter provision, or statute, requiring the surety on such bonds to be indemnity insurance companies, the city manager of Brunswick, who is charged with the duty of approving such bonds, is without authority to require that the surety on such bonds be indemnity companies, and to refuse bonds given with personal sureties, solely upon the ground that the sureties are not indemnity companies.
3. Applying the above rulings, the trial judge erred in not granting a mandamus absolute, requiring the city manager to accept the bond offered by the plaintiff with personal sureties.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 S.E. 66, 165 Ga. 434, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-city-of-brunswick-ga-1927.