Franklin v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Franklin v. Cannon

1 Root 500

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1793·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The jury found a verdict for the defendant, which was accepted by the court.

[501]*501It <lid not appear in this case that tlie defendant was anywise the canse of said deed’s remaining so long unrecorded, or but that it was owing to the negligence of the town clerk. The new note for £52 lawful money appeared to he a part of the original mortgage money, and the changing of the security had not discharged the debt nor altered the lien upon the land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The jury found a verdict for the defendant, which was accepted by the court.

[501]*501It <lid not appear in this case that tlie defendant was anywise the canse of said deed’s remaining so long unrecorded, or but that it was owing to the negligence of the town clerk. The new note for £52 lawful money appeared to he a part of the original mortgage money, and the changing of the security had not discharged the debt nor altered the lien upon the land.

Franklin v. Cannon, 1 Root 500 (Colo. 1793).

Pincite

1 Root 500 (Franklin v. Cannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related