Franklin v. Bank of Colbert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Franklin v. Bank of Colbert

84 S.E. 131, 143 Ga. 51, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 281

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 131 (Franklin v. Bank of Colbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin v. Bank of Colbert, 84 S.E. 131, 143 Ga. 51, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 281 (Ga. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The act of 1912 (Acts 1912, p. 153), relating to notes given for the sale of stock in incorporated companies, being a substantial reproduction of the act of 1897 (Civil Code, §§ 4293, 4294) relating to notes given for the sale of patent rights, is to be similarly construed, and, being thus construed, is controlled by the decisions in the cases of Smith v. Wood, 111 Ga. 221 (36 S. E. 649); Parr v. Erickson, 115 Ga. [52]*52873 (42 S. E. 240); Hunt v. Davenport, 138 Ga. 622 (75 S. E. 644) ; Heard v. National Bank of Wilkes, ante, 48 (84 S. E. 129).

January 16, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton superior court. November 12, 1913.

B. W. Milner, for plaintiffs in error. Rogers & Knox, contra.

2. There was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. The act of 1912 (Acts 1912, p. 153), relating to notes given for the sale of stock in incorporated companies, being a substantial reproduction of the act of 1897 (Civil Code, §§ 4293, 4294) relating to notes given for the sale of patent rights, is to be similarly construed, and, being thus construed, is controlled by the decisions in the cases of Smith v. Wood, 111 Ga. 221 (36 S. E. 649); Parr v. Erickson, 115 Ga. [52]*52873 (42 S. E. 240); Hunt v. Davenport, 138 Ga. 622 (75 S. E. 644) ; Heard v. National Bank of Wilkes, ante, 48 (84 S. E. 129).

January 16, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton superior court. November 12, 1913.

B. W. Milner, for plaintiffs in error. Rogers & Knox, contra.

2. There was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 S.E. 131, 143 Ga. 51, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-bank-of-colbert-ga-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack