Franklin v. Bank of Colbert

84 S.E. 131, 143 Ga. 51, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 281
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 16, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The act of 1912 (Acts 1912, p. 153), relating to notes given for the sale of stock in incorporated companies, being a substantial reproduction of the act of 1897 (Civil Code, §§ 4293, 4294) relating to notes given for the sale of patent rights, is to be similarly construed, and, being thus construed, is controlled by the decisions in the cases of Smith v. Wood, 111 Ga. 221 (36 S. E. 649); Parr v. Erickson, 115 Ga. [52]*52873 (42 S. E. 240); Hunt v. Davenport, 138 Ga. 622 (75 S. E. 644) ; Heard v. National Bank of Wilkes, ante, 48 (84 S. E. 129).

January 16, 1915. Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton superior court. November 12, 1913. B. W. Milner, for plaintiffs in error. Rogers & Knox, contra.

2. There was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. Bank of Colbert, 84 S.E. 131, 143 Ga. 51, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 281 (Ga. 1915).

84 S.E. 131 (Franklin v. Bank of Colbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. Bank of Dawson
179 S.E. 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Beckworth v. Bank of Colbert
84 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)