Franklin v. Ackerman

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedApril 2, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-05071
StatusUnknown

This text of Franklin v. Ackerman (Franklin v. Ackerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin v. Ackerman, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JOSHUA G. FRANKLIN Sr., 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05071-RSM-BAT 10 v. ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AND DIRECTING 11 JOHN ACKERMAN, et al., SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL ON REMAINING DEFENDANTS 12 Defendant. 13

14 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, 15 United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 16 (1) The Court ADOPTS the report and recommendation, Dkt. 9. Plaintiff’s claims set 17 forth on pages 18-19 of the complaint, Dkt. 4, against defendants Jeannie Bryant, Deputy 18 Prosecuting Attorney and Public Defenders Neil Anderson and Michelle Michaelex are 19 DISMISSED with prejudice. 20 (2) The Clerk is therefore directed to terminate those defendants from the docket. 21 (3) The remaining claims against the remaining defendants are re-referred to 22 Magistrate Judge Tsuchida. 23 (4) The Court further orders: ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AND 1 a. Service by Clerk on Plaintiff 2 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Washington Corrections Center at Monroe and is 3 subject to Mandatory Electronic E-Filing pursuant to General Orders 02-15 and 06-16. Plaintiff 4 must therefore file all pleadings using the E-Filing procedures set forth in the general orders. 5 Pleadings that are not filed in conformity with the E-Filing procedures will be summarily

6 stricken. The Clerk shall provide copies of all pleadings to Plaintiff using the E-Service 7 procedures. 8 Service by Clerk on Defendants 9 Defendants are allegedly employees or agents of Clark County and the Clerk is directed 10 to send the following to the defendants listed below by United States Mail: copies of plaintiff’s 11 Complaint (Dkt. 4), this Order, the notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of 12 summons, and a waiver of service of summons: 13 John Ackerman HAS Naphcare K. Vandenberg D.O.N Naphcare 14 C. Hackney R.N. Clark County Jail Kerri Taft R.N. Clark County Jail 15 K. Beltran Commander Clark County Jail Chuck Atkins Sheriff, Clark County 16 Ric Bishop Chief Clark County Sheriff Songer Sergeant Clark County Jail 17 A. Rice R.N. Clark County Jail M. Paulus R.N. Clark County Jail 18 Shoemaker Officer Clark County Jail

19 The defendants are notified they need not respond to claims regarding the dismissed 20 public defenders and deputy prosecuting attorney as those claims have been dismissed with 21 prejudice by separate order. 22 The Clerk shall provide a courtesy copy of the above to the Clark County Prosecuting 23 Attorney 1300 Franklyn Street, Third Floor, PO Box 5000, Vancouver, WA 98666-5000. The ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AND 1 Court declines to direct service against any named Jane/John Does defendants at this time as 2 those individuals have not been sufficiently identified. 3 b. Response Required 4 Defendant(s) shall have thirty (30) days within which to return the enclosed waiver of 5 service of summons. A defendant who timely returns the signed waiver shall have sixty (60)

6 days after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an answer to the 7 complaint or a motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 8 A defendant who fails to timely return the signed waiver will be personally served with a 9 summons and complaint and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to 10 Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A defendant who has been personally 11 served shall file an answer or motion permitted under Rule 12 within twenty-one (21) days after 12 service. 13 c. Filing and Service by Parties, Generally 14 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court must file documents electronically via

15 the Court’s CM/ECF system. Counsel are directed to the Court’s website, 16 www.wawd.uscourts.gov, for a detailed description of the requirements for filing via CM/ECF. 17 Plaintiff shall file all documents electronically using the above e-filing procedures because 18 he is in the custody of the Washington State Department of Corrections. All filings must 19 indicate in the upper right-hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom the document 20 is directed. 21 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 22 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. Plaintiffs shall 23 indicate the date the document is submitted for e-filing as the date of service.

ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AND 1 d. Motions, Generally 2 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 3 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), the argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 4 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 5 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for

6 consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. 7 Stipulated and agreed motions, motions to file over-length motions or briefs, motions for 8 reconsideration, joint submissions pursuant to the option procedure established in LCR 37(a)(2), 9 motions for default, requests for the clerk to enter default judgment, and motions for the court to 10 enter default judgment where the opposing party has not appeared shall be noted for 11 consideration on the day they are filed. See LCR 7(d)(1). All other non-dispositive motions shall 12 be noted for consideration no earlier than the third Friday following filing and service of the 13 motion. See LCR 7(d)(3). All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than 14 the fourth Friday following filing and service of the motion. Id.

15 For electronic filers, all briefs and affidavits in opposition to either a dispositive or non- 16 dispositive motion shall be filed and served not later than 11:59 p.m. on the Monday 17 immediately preceding the date designated for consideration of the motion. 18 The party making the motion may electronically file and serve not later than 11:59 p.m. 19 on the date designated for consideration of the motion, a reply to the opposing party’s briefs and 20 affidavits. 21 e. Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment 22 Parties filing motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure and motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil

ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AND 1 Procedure should acquaint themselves with those rules. As noted above, these motions shall be 2 noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the 3 motion. 4 Defendants filing motions to dismiss based on a failure to exhaust or motions for 5 summary judge are advised that they MUST serve a Rand notice concurrently with motions to

6 dismiss based on a failure to exhaust and motions for summary judgment so that pro se prisoner 7 plaintiffs will have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in order to 8 oppose those motions. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 941 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth Circuit has 9 set forth model language for such notices: 10 A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Franklin v. Ackerman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-ackerman-wawd-2021.