Franklin Union No. 23, Inc. v. Berry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Franklin Union No. 23, Inc. v. Berry

147 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1914

DocketNo. 5783

StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.Y.S. 1112 (Franklin Union No. 23, Inc. v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin Union No. 23, Inc. v. Berry, 147 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without concurring in the reasons expressed at Special Term for denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction, and without expressing any opinion as to whether or not the plaintiff would, after the trial of the action, be entitled to a judgment securing the exclusive right to use its corporate name, this order upon the plaintiff’s appeal is affirmed, leaving question as to the judgment to which the plaintiff will be entitled to be settled upon the trial of the action. Upon the appeal of the defendants from that part of the order granting an injunction, we think the court below was right, and that the order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed. The order is therefore affirmed, without costs to either party upon this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Without concurring in the reasons expressed at Special Term for denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction, and without expressing any opinion as to whether or not the plaintiff would, after the trial of the action, be entitled to a judgment securing the exclusive right to use its corporate name, this order upon the plaintiff’s appeal is affirmed, leaving question as to the judgment to which the plaintiff will be entitled to be settled upon the trial of the action. Upon the appeal of the defendants from that part of the order granting an injunction, we think the court below was right, and that the order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed. The order is therefore affirmed, without costs to either party upon this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-union-no-23-inc-v-berry-nyappdiv-1914.