Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington

118 A. 115, 274 Pa. 205, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 667

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 8, 1922

DocketAppeal, No. 259

StatusPublished

This text of 118 A. 115 (Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington, 118 A. 115, 274 Pa. 205, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 667 (Pa. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this case the court below entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in an action founded on certain sales memoranda of the same character as that quoted in our opinion in Franklin Sugar Refining Company v. Howell, filed herewith [the preceding case]. The questions raised and decided there are controlling here also, and hence the same judgment must be entered.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and a procedendo is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this case the court below entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in an action founded on certain sales memoranda of the same character as that quoted in our opinion in Franklin Sugar Refining Company v. Howell, filed herewith [the preceding case]. The questions raised and decided there are controlling here also, and hence the same judgment must be entered.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and a procedendo is awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A. 115, 274 Pa. 205, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-sugar-refining-co-v-huntington-pa-1922.