Franklin (Marty) Vs. State
This text of Franklin (Marty) Vs. State (Franklin (Marty) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARTY A. FRANKLIN, No. 80105 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. _IAN O6 MO ELI CLE BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Jr( CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See NRAP 4(b); Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944 (1994). In addition, appellant has previously appealed the judgment of conviction in Docket No. 79530. A second duplicate appeal may not be pursued. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Marty A. Franklin Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney SUPREME COURT Washoe District Court Clerk OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A migirt0 o -e 00111
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Franklin (Marty) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-marty-vs-state-nev-2020.