Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 894

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1967

DocketNo. P67/346

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 894 (Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 894 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A,” covered by the foregoing protests, consist of padlocks, not cabinet locks; that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of cabinet locks; and that said items marked “A” or “B” are of plate or disc tumbler construction similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A,” covered by the foregoing protests, consist of padlocks, not cabinet locks; that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of cabinet locks; and that said items marked “A” or “B” are of plate or disc tumbler construction similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-lock-pulley-mfg-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack