Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 894
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A,” covered by the foregoing protests, consist of padlocks, not cabinet locks; that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of cabinet locks; and that said items marked “A” or “B” are of plate or disc tumbler construction similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 894 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 894 (Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 422 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)