Franklin L. Hall v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison

422 F.2d 1320, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10834
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 1970
Docket24066_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 F.2d 1320 (Franklin L. Hall v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin L. Hall v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison, 422 F.2d 1320, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10834 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Franklin L. Hall, presently incarcerated in Nevada State Prison, appeals from a district court order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Hall’s purpose in applying for habeas relief was to set aside his conviction for second degree murder, entered on a plea of guilty.

On this appeal Hall argues that the district court erred in denying his application because he did not have the assistance of competent and effective counsel in the state criminal proceedings. He further argues that his change of plea from not guilty of first degree murder to guilty of second degree murder was involuntary.

These issues were fully explored in the district court. Two attorneys were appointed to represent Hall in the district court proceedings and an evidentiary hearing was held. The district court had before it the state records in' Hall’s criminal proceeding as well as in his subsequent state habeas proceeding. Denial of state habeas relief had been upheld by the Supreme Court of Nevada. See Hall v. Warden, Nevada State Prison, 83 Nev. 446, 434 P.2d 425 (1967).

*1321 In its order denying habeas relief, the district court made findings of fact adverse to Hall on the issues referred to above, and stated additional reasons why Hall was not entitled to relief. We are in full accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cancino v. Craven
363 F. Supp. 817 (C.D. California, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 F.2d 1320, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-l-hall-v-carl-hocker-warden-nevada-state-prison-ca9-1970.