Franklin County v. Gillespie

73 S.E. 833, 137 Ga. 567, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 88
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. The note of the trial judge, appended to the ground of the motion for a new trial complaining of the exclusion of certain testimony of several witnesses, indicates that he did not intend to approve the ground as stated; and therefore this court can not pass upon the merits of such ground.

2. The grounds of the motion assigning error upon the mere failure of the court, in the absence of any written request, to further instruct the jury as to certain matters dealt with in the charge, are without merit, when considered in connection with the entire charge as given.

3. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin County v. Gillespie, 73 S.E. 833, 137 Ga. 567, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1912).

73 S.E. 833 (Franklin County v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. State
128 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Haygood v. Clark Co.
107 S.E. 379 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)