Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney v. Walker

885 N.E.2d 241, 117 Ohio St. 3d 537
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-2121
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 885 N.E.2d 241 (Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney v. Walker, 885 N.E.2d 241, 117 Ohio St. 3d 537 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hyle v. Porter, 117 Ohio St.3d 165, 2008-Ohio-542, 882 N.E.2d 899.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Benedetta
2013 Ohio 4364 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
O'Brien v. Whalen, 08ap-918 (4-16-2009)
2009 Ohio 1807 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
885 N.E.2d 241, 117 Ohio St. 3d 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-county-prosecuting-attorney-v-walker-ohio-2008.