Franklin County Exchange, Inc. v. Shores

63 So. 2d 732, 37 Ala. App. 73, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 338
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1953·No. 8 Div. 319·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant was the plaintiff in the court below. The complaint contained one count in code form claiming $123 due for goods and merchandise sold to defendant. Verdict and judgment was for the defendant.

No charges were requested in the trial below, nor did appellant file a motion for a new trial.

Appellant has assigned thirteen errors on this appeal. The first twelve of these assignments relate to rulings of the court as to the admission or rejection of evidence. None of these assignments are carried forward in appellant’s brief alluded to in any way. They will therefore be deemed waived. Snellings v. Jones, 33 Ala.App. 301, 33 So.2d 371; Christ v. Spizman, 33 Ala.App. 586, 35 So.2d 568.

The thirteenth assignment of error is to the effect that the verdict and judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

On an appeal from a jury’s verdict and judgment entered pursuant thereto the weight of the evidence, in the absence of a motion for a new trial, will not be considered. See 2 Alabama Digest, Appeal and Error, ®=5294(1), for innumerable cases enunciating this doctrine.

. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin County Exchange, Inc. v. Shores, 63 So. 2d 732, 37 Ala. App. 73, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 338 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

63 So. 2d 732 (Franklin County Exchange, Inc. v. Shores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Mobile v. Cunningham
243 So. 2d 723 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)