Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00346-CR
FRANKLIN CALVIN JONES, JR., APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 264th District Court Bell County, Texas Trial Court No. 83519, Honorable Paul L. LePak, Presiding
November 8, 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr., appealed his theft conviction and eight-year
prison sentence. We dismiss the untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The trial court orally sentenced appellant on July 26, 2023. His motion for new trial
was due thirty days thereafter, that is, August 25, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a).
1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. However, it was not filed until August 28, 2023. Being untimely, it did not extend the
deadline by which to perfect an appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (requiring a notice of
appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentencing or within ninety days if a timely motion
for new trial is filed). That deadline fell on August 25, 2023, as well. See TEX. R. APP. P.
26.2(a)(1). Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal, filed on August 28, 2023, was similarly
late, and no one requested an extension of the deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b),
26.3 (permitting an appellate court to extend the appellate deadline by fifteen days if a
motion for extension is filed that reasonably explains the need for an extension).
The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). When
the notice is untimely and the deadline has not been extended, we must dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
(en banc).
By letter of October 12, 2023, we notified Appellant of the consequences of his
late notice of appeal. We also directed him to show, by October 23, 2023, how the Court
has jurisdiction over the appeal. He has yet to communicate with the court.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to
the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-calvin-jones-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.