Franklin Butler v. Jessica Cabassa

186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 2016 WL 892652
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 2016
Docket4D15-2984
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 1114 (Franklin Butler v. Jessica Cabassa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin Butler v. Jessica Cabassa, 186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 2016 WL 892652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

TAYLOR, J.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the amended final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. The original judgment entered in this case made no provision for a change; in time-sharing with the minor child.- However, without notice to appellant or' any pleadings to amend the judgment for such relief, the trial court sua sponte entered an amended judgment that awarded one-hundred percent timesharing to appellee. Before the amended judgment was entered, appellant was the primary residential parent for the child.

Appellant’s motion to "vacate stated a preliminary basis for relief by'alleging that the amended judgment should be vacated as void because it was entered without notice or an opportunity to be heard. See Rodriguez v. Santana, 76 So.3d 1035, 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding in a paternity case that-the trial court erred in summarily denying the mother’s motion for relief from judgment where the trial court violated her due process right to notice and an opportunity to be heard before rendering judgment).

At the hearing on appellant’s motion to vacate the amended final judgment, the trial court stated that the amended judgment merely corrected a “clerical error.” However, the transcript of the hearing leading up to the original judgment shows that the issue of custody was not argued or ruled upon at the hearing. Because the trial court erred in summarily denying appellant’s motion to vacate the amended final judgment, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

WÁRNE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Santana
76 So. 3d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 2016 WL 892652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-butler-v-jessica-cabassa-fladistctapp-2016.