Franklin Bank v. Hipkins & Rochford
2 D.C. 315
This text of 2 D.C. 315 (Franklin Bank v. Hipkins & Rochford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Franklin Bank v. Hipkins & Rochford, 2 D.C. 315 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
(nem. con.) rejected the witness; because the action being joint, the judgment must be joint; and if, upon the trial of the issue against Eochford the verdict should be in his favor, there can be no judgment against Hipkins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-bank-v-hipkins-rochford-circtddc-1822.