Franklin Bank-Note Co. v. Augusta & West Florida Railway Co.

30 S.E. 419, 102 Ga. 547, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 541
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 419 (Franklin Bank-Note Co. v. Augusta & West Florida Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin Bank-Note Co. v. Augusta & West Florida Railway Co., 30 S.E. 419, 102 Ga. 547, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 541 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Pish, J.

1. An equitable petition which designated and described as a law-

ful corporation, whose charter had expired by limitation of time, the only defendant therein named, which alleged that the plaintiff had already at law obtained a judgment against such defendant, and which prayed for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of its property, to the end that certain of its corporate' assets might be subjected to the satisfaction of such judgment, could not be practically converted into an action against a number of private persons who had participated as incorporators in the formation of the corporation, by an amendment making these persons parties defendant, averring non-compliance with ■ the law in organizing the corporation, negativing the legality of its corporate existence and transactions, and, for these reasons and because of alleged frauds on the part of these persons, praying for a judgment rendering them individually liable for the plaintiff’s demand.

2. Whether these persons were or were not primarily liable, such an amendment was not germane to the action as brought, and undoubtedly set forth an entirely new and distinct cause of action.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Equitable petition. Before Judge Callaway. Richmond superior court. April 6, 1896. Charles Z. McCord, by Harrison & Peeples, for plaintiff. Frank H Miller, Fleming & Alexander, Bacon, Miller & Brunson, J. S. & W T. Davidson, H C. Roney, Black & Verdery and Frank H. Miller Jr., for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowe v. Atlanta Coca Cola Bottling Co.
159 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Laken v. SUNBRAND SUPPLY COMPANY
108 S.E.2d 323 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E. 419, 102 Ga. 547, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-bank-note-co-v-augusta-west-florida-railway-co-ga-1897.