Franklin Associates v. GSL Enterprises, Inc.
This text of 248 A.D.2d 251 (Franklin Associates v. GSL Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira [252]*252Gammerman, J.), entered March 5, 1997, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for a ruling that a claim for unpaid rent that defendant intended to submit to the Special Referee is unenforceable, denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment on that claim, and vacated prior orders of reference, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to reinstate the reference with respect to plaintiffs cause of action for an accounting, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The deferred rent that defendant is seeking to collect clearly did not, under the parties’ second lease modification, become due until September 1, 1992, and is therefore uncollectible, it being law of the case that plaintiff “is not responsible for any obligations under the lease incurred after September 6, 1991” (213 AD2d 313). Indeed, defendant’s answer never pleaded that this rent accrued before the surrender of the lease or otherwise indicated that it was an item defendant was seeking to recover. However, it was error to cancel the reference since plaintiffs second cause of action for an accounting of various tax payments it was compelled to deposit into escrow remains unresolved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 251, 669 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-associates-v-gsl-enterprises-inc-nyappdiv-1998.