Frankie Ray McKinney v. State
This text of Frankie Ray McKinney v. State (Frankie Ray McKinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed November 5, 2015
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________
No. 11-15-00228-CR __________
FRANKIE RAY MCKINNEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 385th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR44036
ORDER Court-appointed counsel for Frankie Ray McKinney has filed in this court a timely motion to abate this appeal to give the trial court an opportunity to conduct a hearing on McKinney’s motion to proceed pro se in this appeal. We grant counsel’s motion and abate this appeal. We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that the trial court may determine the following: 1. Whether McKinney desires to prosecute this appeal; 2. Whether McKinney is indigent; 3. If not indigent, whether McKinney has retained counsel for this appeal; and 4. If indigent, whether McKinney desires to have counsel appointed to represent him in this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, McKinney competently and intelligently chooses to exercise the right to represent himself.
If it is determined that McKinney is indigent and is exercising his right to represent himself, the trial court must develop evidence as to whether McKinney’s decision to proceed without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Ex parte Davis, 818 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780, 783–86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976). The trial court is directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court. The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings, recommendations, and any orders of the trial court. The court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s record from the hearing. These records are due to be filed in this court on or before December 21, 2015. The motion to abate is granted, and the appeal is abated.
PER CURIAM November 5, 2015 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frankie Ray McKinney v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankie-ray-mckinney-v-state-texapp-2015.