Frankie L. Polk v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 14, 2014·No. 14-14-00505-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 14, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00505-CR

FRANKIE L. POLK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1175958

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from the trial court’s order signed December 5, 2013, denying appellant’s post-conviction motion for forensic DNA testing pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1 Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on May 19, 2014. Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely.

1 This court affirmed appellant’s conviction for sexual assault of a child. See Polk v. State, No. 14-09-00131-CR, 2010 WL 3354012 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 26, 2010, pet. dism’d) (not designated for publication). A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after an appealable order is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and the court can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankie L. Polk v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Frankie L. Polk v. State (Frankie L. Polk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)