Frankie Greer v. County of San Diego

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frankie Greer v. County of San Diego. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 F.4th 1216
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2025·No. 23-55607·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANKIE GREER, No. 23-55607

Plaintiff, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00378- and JO-DEB

SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, LLC; PRISON LEGAL NEWS; ORDER VOICE OF SAN DIEGO,

Intervenors-Appellees,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

Defendant-Appellant,

WILLIAM GORE, Sheriff; ALFRED JOSHUA, M.D.; BARBARA LEE; MACY GERMONO; FRANCISCO BRAVO; CHRISTOPHER SIMMS; MICHAEL CAMPOS,

Defendants.

Filed August 28, 2025

Before: Susan P. Graber, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Lucy H. Koh, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Graber and Judge Callahan voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Koh voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Callahan voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Graber so recommended. Judge Koh voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40. Judge Owens did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. No. 76, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankie Greer v. County of San Diego, (9th Cir. 2025).

Frankie Greer v. County of San Diego (Frankie Greer v. County of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.