Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.

358 N.W.2d 53, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1519

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 21, 1984

DocketNos. C7-83-1533, C0-83-1535

StatusPublished

This text of 358 N.W.2d 53 (Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frankfurth v. Sunstar Foods, Inc., 358 N.W.2d 53, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1519 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

TODD, Justice.

Ronald Frankfurth has received compensation for an injury sustained while employed by Armour and Company. Frank-furth was subsequently employed by Suns-tar where both he and Armour claim a new injury occurred. The compensation judge held that no new injury had occurred. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed.

We hold that the Court of Appeals applied the proper standard of review and that the decision is not manifestly contrary to the evidence. See Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1984) (filed herewith).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI