Frankenstein v. Weber

Appellate Court of Illinois

Frankenstein v. Weber

188 Ill. App. 573, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 572

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 7, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,198·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 26*—sufficiency of statement of facts. The record does not contain a correct statement of facts, where what purports to he such a statement is merely a statement that certain witnesses testified to certain facts, in substance, as there stated in narrative form. 2. Sales, § 329*—sufficiency of evidence. On review of a judgment for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered, evidence in the record as presented held to show an original promise by defendants to pay for the articles furnished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 26*—sufficiency of statement of facts. The record does not contain a correct statement of facts, where what purports to he such a statement is merely a statement that certain witnesses testified to certain facts, in substance, as there stated in narrative form. 2. Sales, § 329*—sufficiency of evidence. On review of a judgment for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered, evidence in the record as presented held to show an original promise by defendants to pay for the articles furnished.

Frankenstein v. Weber, 188 Ill. App. 573, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 572 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

188 Ill. App. 573 (Frankenstein v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.