Frankenburg v. United States
This text of 77 F. 606 (Frankenburg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statute requires an appellant to “give notice in writing to the collector,” within 10 days. 26 Stat. 137, § lá. By understanding and practice, this notice is not given to the collector in person, but is left with a clerk or on his desk, where it will be found by him, in a room of the customhouse. In this case the duties were liquidated on October 29th. On November 7th, after business hours and departure of the clerk, a notice was left on his desk. On the 8th, which war. election day, the customhouse was, at the request of the collector, closed for all but special purposes, not concerning this, by direction of the secretary of the treasury, and this clerk was not there. On the 9th he found the notice there, in the proper place, and stamped it as received then. The appeal was rejected, because this was thought to be too late. As the collector consented to take notice in that way, notice given in that way would, if in time, be sufficient. The 8th was in time, and the notice Avas there. That was not a legal holiday, on which the customhouse Avould, as on Sunday, be closed for this purpose, and so not a day on which people would be bound to take any notice that it would be so closed. This closing was, in effect, as if the collector had closed the customhouse, or this clerk had stayed away, for any purpose of his own. The appellant had no occasion to go there on the 8th to leave the notice, for it was already there; and he had a right to act with refer-[607]*607once to it as there. Had he waited till the 8th, and failed to leave it, because the customhouse was so closed, a different question might be presented. Now, the appellant appears to have been in ample lime, and entitled to have his appeal considered. Decision reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 F. 606, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankenburg-v-united-states-circtsdny-1896.