Frankel v. Yeshiva University

37 A.D.3d 760, 829 N.Y.S.2d 906
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 37 A.D.3d 760 (Frankel v. Yeshiva University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frankel v. Yeshiva University, 37 A.D.3d 760, 829 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment directing the plaintiffs reinstatement to the defendant’s clinical psychology program, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), entered August 22, 2005, which granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiffs challenge to his termination from the defendant’s clinical psychology program for academic deficiencies should have been brought in the context of a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 78 (see Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 92-93 [1999]; Diehl v St. John Fisher Coll., 278 AD2d 816 [2000]; Klinge v Ithaca Coll., 244 AD2d 611 [1997]; see also Matter of Lusardi v State Univ. of N.Y. at Buffalo, 284 AD2d 992 [2001]; Matter of McDermott v New York Med. Coll., 228 AD2d 967 [1996]; Aranoff v Fordham Univ., 171 AD2d 434 [1991]). Since the plaintiffs action was commenced nearly six years after he was terminated from the subject program, it was properly dismissed as untimely (see CELR 217 [1]; Diehl v St. John Fisher Coll., supra; Aranoff v Fordham Univ., supra).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. State Univ. of N.Y., Binghamton Univ.
162 N.Y.S.3d 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Meisner v. Hamilton, Fulton, Montgomery Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs.
2019 NY Slip Op 6558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Hernandez v. Teachers College, Columbia University
2017 NY Slip Op 6433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sarwar v. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of New York Institute of Technology
2017 NY Slip Op 3788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Clogher v. New York Medical College
112 A.D.3d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Wander v. St. John's University
99 A.D.3d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.3d 760, 829 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-yeshiva-university-nyappdiv-2007.