Frankel v. Thibault
This text of 668 So. 2d 214 (Frankel v. Thibault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, intervenor below, appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction and appeals a non-final order denying his motion to dissolve the same. We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to make an express finding as to whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law. See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 659 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-thibault-fladistctapp-1996.