Frankel v. Thibault

668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2434
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 So. 2d 214 (Frankel v. Thibault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frankel v. Thibault, 668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

GUNTHER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, intervenor below, appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction and appeals a non-final order denying his motion to dissolve the same. We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to make an express finding as to whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law. See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 659 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kipp v. State
668 So. 2d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-thibault-fladistctapp-1996.