Frankel v. Thibault
668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1996·No. No. 95-2434·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant, intervenor below, appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction and appeals a non-final order denying his motion to dissolve the same. We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to make an express finding as to whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law. See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 659 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frankel v. Thibault, 668 So. 2d 214, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 15484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
668 So. 2d 214 (Frankel v. Thibault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kipp v. State
668 So. 2d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)