Frankel v. Keller Printing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Frankel v. Keller Printing Co.

92 N.Y.S. 282

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 282 (Frankel v. Keller Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frankel v. Keller Printing Co., 92 N.Y.S. 282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon an affidavit full and complete, specifying, among other things, that the defendant cannot safely proceed to trial without the particulars asked for, a motion was made for a bill of particulars in this action. This affidavit was not disputed, the plaintiff submitting no answering affidavits. In view of the undisputed allegation set forth in said affidavit showing a proper case for the ordering of a bill of particulars, the order herein should be reversed.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon an affidavit full and complete, specifying, among other things, that the defendant cannot safely proceed to trial without the particulars asked for, a motion was made for a bill of particulars in this action. This affidavit was not disputed, the plaintiff submitting no answering affidavits. In view of the undisputed allegation set forth in said affidavit showing a proper case for the ordering of a bill of particulars, the order herein should be reversed.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-keller-printing-co-nyappterm-1905.