Frankel v. Frankel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frankel v. Frankel

266 A.D.2d 186, 696 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11078

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 186 (Frankel v. Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frankel v. Frankel, 266 A.D.2d 186, 696 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yancey, J.), dated April 22, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff wife maintenance in the sum of $150 per week for one year, and, awarded $444.01 per week as support for the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

[187]*187Upon consideration of the relevant factors (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]), we discern no impropriety in the award of maintenance to the plaintiff, either in amount or duration (see, Galakis v Galakis, 260 AD2d 431; Ferraro v Ferraro, 257 AD2d 596).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yancey, J.), dated April 22, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff wife maintenance in the sum of $150 per week for one year, and, awarded $444.01 per week as support for the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

[187]*187Upon consideration of the relevant factors (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]), we discern no impropriety in the award of maintenance to the plaintiff, either in amount or duration (see, Galakis v Galakis, 260 AD2d 431; Ferraro v Ferraro, 257 AD2d 596).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 186, 696 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-frankel-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack