Frankel v. Frankel

268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3231
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frankel v. Frankel. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D. 943

Opinion

Order insofar as it modifies the final decree unanimously reversed and the issues raised by the conflicting affidavits referred to an official referee for the purpose of talcing proof and reporting to Special Term. That provision of the order appealed from which denies-the plaintiff’s cross motion “to have defendant declared in contempt of court ” is unanimously affirmed with leave to renew after the filing of the report of the official referee. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankel v. Frankel, 268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 752 (Frankel v. Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.